Introducing the carbon tax shift, Dion eloquently explained:
The Liberal Green Shift is as powerful as it is simple. We will cut taxes on those things we want more of such as income, investment and innovation. And we will shift taxes to what we all want less of: pollution, greenhouse gas emissions and waste. We need to make polluters pay an put every single penny back into the hands of Canadians.
The Green Shift Plan will be good for the environment and good for the economy. Good for the planet and good for your wallet. We need to make real progress in the fight against climate crisis, and at the same time make our economy more competitive. While energy prices continue to rise, we need to encourage energy efficiency.
Some have said that nobody would have the courage or the political will to
do what we believe is right. We need to do it. We will do it.
Dion’s message and a detailed description of the Green Shift can be found in the Green Shift Handbook, easily downloaded from the Green Shift web page. The Green Shift will begin with an immediate $10 per tonne tax on carbon and steadily rise by an additional $10 per tonne each year, reaching $40 per tonne within four years.
The tax will apply at the wholesale level to all fossil fuels based upon their respective carbon content. The tax will not apply to gasoline at the pump, since the existing excise tax on gasoline at the pump is already the equivalent of $42 per tonne of carbon.
Revenue-neutrality is a key element of the Green Shift, which clearly states that “For every dollar raised in taxes there will be a dollar returned to Canadians in tax cuts.” The Auditor General will ensure the Green Shift’s revenue-neutrality.
The Green Shift will return the “pollution dividend” to Canadians through:
- Significant, broad-based income tax reductions, increasing each year as the pollution tax revenue rises;
- Reforms to the tax system to make it fairer for low-income Canadians, including;
o Introducing a new, universal child tax benefit worth $350 per child, per year,
on top of all existing child benefits;
o Replacing the existing $1,000 employment credit with a $1,850 refundable
employment credit targeting those making less than $50,000 per year;
o Enriching the Working Income Tax Benefit, making it available on the first
dollar earned; and
o Making the Disability Tax Credit refundable;
- Additional support for rural and Northern Canadians, with every rural Canadian receiving, up front, an annual Green Rural Credit of $150;
- A boost in the Northern Residents Deduction for those living in
Canada
- Broad-based corporate tax reductions;
- Small-business income tax reductions;
- Accelerated capital cost allowances for green technologies; and
- Better research and development incentives.
The Green Shift is already receiving massive press coverage in
Canadian environmentalists have been far more supportive. According to an article in today’s Montreal Gazette, Greenpeace offered qualified support for the Green Shift arguing the price should be even higher, Équiterre says it’s the type of policy it could support and the Sierra Club Canada’s executive director said, "The benefit of a carbon tax is that it can be applied quickly, thereby raising the price of carbon emissions sooner; cap-and-trade systems have their benefits but they do take longer to implement properly."
That’s CTC’s response, too. We applaud Dion’s political courage, but we prefer a higher carbon tax. We fully support the concept of revenue neutrality and like the “shift” and “dividend” language, although we would prefer more direct return of the revenues through a Green Shift/carbon tax dividend or offsetting tax reductions. We applaud Dion’s targeting of Green Shift/carbon tax revenues to low-income rural energy users, necessary for both equity and political reasons. Finally, we’re intrigued that the Green Shift does not tax gasoline at the pump, although we expect that some portion of the tax will be passed through to retail customers. As we noted in a post last week, gasoline prices have already increased as much in the last year as we proposed for the next ten years. A floor on gasoline prices maintained by a revenue-neutral carbon tax might be appropriate.
There will be plenty of time to carefully examine the details of the Green Shift and, we’re sure, plenty of lessons to be learned about both the substance of the Green Shift and the politics of promoting a carbon tax. Stay tuned!
Photo of Stéphane Dion: http://www.liberal.ca/glance_e.aspx